Court File No. 39740 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO The Honourable Mr. Justice Doherty ) The Honourable Mr. Justice Goudge ) The Honourable Madam Justice Simmons ) ) Tuesday Oct 7 2003 BETWEEN: JOHN C. TURMEL AND J.J. MARC PAQUETTE Applicants (Appellants) - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent (Respondent) ORDER THIS APPEAL by John C. Turmel and J.J. Marc Paquette for a declaration A) that the prohibition on the possession of marijuana in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act is a genocidal violation of Applicants' S.7 Right to Life in accordance with the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. Parker and has been of no force and effect since Aug. 1 2001; or in the alternative B) granting Applicant a personal judicial exemption was heard on July 29, 30, and 31 2003 at Osgoode Hall, 130 Queen Street West, Toronto, and judgment having been reserved until this day, ON READING the material filed by the parties and on hearing the submissions of John C. Turmel, appearing in person, and counsel for Her Majesty the Queen, 1. THIS COURT ORDERS the confirmation that the Government had not enacted a constitutionally sound medical exemption by July 31 2001 and that the marihuana prohibition in s. 4 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act has been of no force or effect after July 31, 2001. 2. THIS COURT ORDERS that subsection 4(2)(c), section 7, subsection 34(2), subsection 41(b) and section 54 of the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations, S.O.R./2001-227 are of no force and effect which renders constitutional the medical exemption as described in the remaining provisions of the MMAR, thereby rendering the possession prohibition in s.4 of the CDSA no longer inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution and immediately constitutionally valid and of full force and effect. 3. THIS COURT ORDERS that the appeal of John C. Turmel and J.J. Marc Paquette is hereby dismissed without costs. _________________________________ (Signature of Judge or Registrar)